About Recomp Report

Our mission

Recomp Report exists to make health and science research legible. Most of what is written about peptides online sits at one of two extremes: dense primary literature written for specialists, or marketing copy that flattens uncertainty into promises. We aim for the space between — accurate, readable explanations of how peptides are characterised, how they are tested, and what published studies can and cannot establish.

What we cover

• Peptide fundamentals — structure, nomenclature, stability and handling as described in the literature.
• Testing and quality — certificates of analysis, purity and identity testing, endotoxin and sterility testing.
• Research methods — HPLC, mass spectrometry, assay design and the limits of each technique.
• Study breakdowns — appraisals that clearly separate in vitro, animal and human evidence.
• Research news — developments in the field, reported with their evidence level attached.

What we do not publish

We do not publish personal treatment advice, dosing guidance, administration or injection instructions, or claims that any peptide treats, cures or prevents a condition. Articles describe research; they are not a substitute for a qualified clinician, and nothing here should be read as a recommendation for human use.

Our background and commercial relationship

Recomp Report is published by the team behind TPG Bioscience, an affiliated research-products business. We state this plainly because it matters: we are not an independent reviewer of our affiliated business, and we do not present ourselves as one. We do not publish comparative reviews ranking TPG Bioscience against other suppliers, and we do not write articles designed to make a specific product look favourable.

Commercial links are labelled, limited to at most one contextual callout inside an article plus an end-of-article panel, and always appear alongside this disclosure. Editorial decisions about what to cover and what the evidence shows are made independently of what is on sale.

How we work

Every article lists its sources, states the evidence tier it is describing, and carries a limitations section. When we get something wrong, we correct it and say so. Our editorial standards and corrections policy describes that process in full.

Contact

Editorial inquiries, correction requests and source suggestions are welcome via our contact page.